<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1421 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the insufficiency of suspicion alone to justify reopening assessments. Concrete evidence and adherence to legal procedures were deemed essential, leading to the quashing of the reassessment order. The decision partially favored the assessee, highlighting the importance of substantiated reasons in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:59:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1421 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the insufficiency of suspicion alone to justify reopening assessments. Concrete evidence and adherence to legal procedures were deemed essential, leading to the quashing of the reassessment order. The decision partially favored the assessee, highlighting the importance of substantiated reasons in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>