https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304800 Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act was construed to bar appeals to vote, or refrain from voting, on grounds of religion, race, caste, community or language, and was upheld as a reasonable restriction in a secular polity. Section 123(3A) was construed to prohibit promotion of enmity or hatred between classes of citizens on the specified grounds and was also upheld as valid; the speeches were found, on their substance and effect, to amount to corrupt practice, including communal appeals for votes and, in one instance, promotion of enmity. Section 99 was held satisfied where the non-party was given pleadings, evidence, cross-examination rights, defence evidence, and a hearing without shown prejudice. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:33:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304800 Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act was construed to bar appeals to vote, or refrain from voting, on grounds of religion, race, caste, community or language, and was upheld as a reasonable restriction in a secular polity. Section 123(3A) was construed to prohibit promotion of enmity or hatred between classes of citizens on the specified grounds and was also upheld as valid; the speeches were found, on their substance and effect, to amount to corrupt practice, including communal appeals for votes and, in one instance, promotion of enmity. Section 99 was held satisfied where the non-party was given pleadings, evidence, cross-examination rights, defence evidence, and a hearing without shown prejudice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304800