https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304799 Priority under a housing allotment scheme must be tested against the eligibility conditions and the factual position on the operative date. Employees in category (iii) failed because they had voluntarily vacated the original quarters and, in some instances, were not in lawful possession when the relevant resolution was passed, so their claim to allotment under the hire purchase scheme was rejected. Employees in category (vi) were also validly excluded because the scheme had changed after the capital shift, the date fixed for priority had a rational nexus with the object of the revised allotment, and the exclusion did not infringe any vested right or constitutional guarantee. en-us Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:27:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304799 Priority under a housing allotment scheme must be tested against the eligibility conditions and the factual position on the operative date. Employees in category (iii) failed because they had voluntarily vacated the original quarters and, in some instances, were not in lawful possession when the relevant resolution was passed, so their claim to allotment under the hire purchase scheme was rejected. Employees in category (vi) were also validly excluded because the scheme had changed after the capital shift, the date fixed for priority had a rational nexus with the object of the revised allotment, and the exclusion did not infringe any vested right or constitutional guarantee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304799