<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 421 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304798</link>
    <description>Urgency acquisition for public housing for weaker sections may dispense with the Section 5-A inquiry where the Government is subjectively satisfied that immediate possession is necessary. That satisfaction carries weight unless affected by mala fides or a colourable exercise of power. Housing for poor communities, including Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, is treated as a pressing public purpose linked to the State&#039;s obligations concerning shelter and social justice. Administrative delay before or after notification does not, by itself, negate urgency and may intensify the need for acquisition. Compulsory acquisition for public purpose with statutory compensation and solatium does not constitute unlawful deprivation of livelihood under Article 21.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:23:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 421 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304798</link>
      <description>Urgency acquisition for public housing for weaker sections may dispense with the Section 5-A inquiry where the Government is subjectively satisfied that immediate possession is necessary. That satisfaction carries weight unless affected by mala fides or a colourable exercise of power. Housing for poor communities, including Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, is treated as a pressing public purpose linked to the State&#039;s obligations concerning shelter and social justice. Administrative delay before or after notification does not, by itself, negate urgency and may intensify the need for acquisition. Compulsory acquisition for public purpose with statutory compensation and solatium does not constitute unlawful deprivation of livelihood under Article 21.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>