<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal rules no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for taxpayer&#039;s revenue classification dispute with Assessing Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66212</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - mere treatment of an amount as revenue (by the AO) instead of capital (by the taxpayer) - The rejection of such a claim by the Appellate Tribunal does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, thereby levying penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:21:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:21:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal rules no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for taxpayer&#039;s revenue classification dispute with Assessing Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66212</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - mere treatment of an amount as revenue (by the AO) instead of capital (by the taxpayer) - The rejection of such a claim by the Appellate Tribunal does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, thereby levying penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:21:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>