https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66211 Jurisdiction of Court to entertain the writ petition - The Petitioners have specifically averred that the Petitioner No.1 would be able to trade with the shares in Mumbai and therefore, impugned order of ROC has affected Petitioners’ rights in Mumbai. The said averments have remained uncontroverted. Thus, it is clear that the consequence of the impugned order fell on the Petitioner at Mumbai where atleast the cause of the action in part has taken place - HC en-us Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:49:34 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:49:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66211 Jurisdiction of Court to entertain the writ petition - The Petitioners have specifically averred that the Petitioner No.1 would be able to trade with the shares in Mumbai and therefore, impugned order of ROC has affected Petitioners’ rights in Mumbai. The said averments have remained uncontroverted. Thus, it is clear that the consequence of the impugned order fell on the Petitioner at Mumbai where atleast the cause of the action in part has taken place - HC Highlights Companies Law Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:49:34 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66211