<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 942 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 80IB despite not filing the audit report electronically. The Tribunal emphasized that filing electronically was directory, not mandatory. The issue of late filing of the return was remanded to the CIT(A) due to a violation of principles of natural justice. The appeal was partly allowed, with the assessee succeeding on the primary issue of disallowance under section 80IB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 07:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 942 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 80IB despite not filing the audit report electronically. The Tribunal emphasized that filing electronically was directory, not mandatory. The issue of late filing of the return was remanded to the CIT(A) due to a violation of principles of natural justice. The appeal was partly allowed, with the assessee succeeding on the primary issue of disallowance under section 80IB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>