<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 937 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for A.Y. 2007-08. The decision was based on the finding that the claim, though incorrect in law, did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Additionally, the debatable nature of the subsidy issue, pending before the High Court, supported the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 937 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for A.Y. 2007-08. The decision was based on the finding that the claim, though incorrect in law, did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Additionally, the debatable nature of the subsidy issue, pending before the High Court, supported the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>