https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429377 The court quashed the impugned order passed by the ROC, NCT Delhi and Haryana, and restored the complaint filed by the petitioner. The ROC was directed to give a fresh hearing to all parties and decide the complaint afresh within six months. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the complaint, including the jurisdiction of the ROC, and kept all contentions of the parties open. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429377 The court quashed the impugned order passed by the ROC, NCT Delhi and Haryana, and restored the complaint filed by the petitioner. The ROC was directed to give a fresh hearing to all parties and decide the complaint afresh within six months. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the complaint, including the jurisdiction of the ROC, and kept all contentions of the parties open. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429377