https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429376 The Tribunal ruled that the Company Petitioners lacked the status of members of the 1st respondent company at the time of filing the Company Petition. As a result, they were deemed to have no standing to maintain the petition under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013. Consequently, Interlocutory Application No. 207/2020 was granted, determining that the Company Petitioners lacked the necessary standing to uphold the Petition under Section 241 of the Companies Act, with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429376 The Tribunal ruled that the Company Petitioners lacked the status of members of the 1st respondent company at the time of filing the Company Petition. As a result, they were deemed to have no standing to maintain the petition under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013. Consequently, Interlocutory Application No. 207/2020 was granted, determining that the Company Petitioners lacked the necessary standing to uphold the Petition under Section 241 of the Companies Act, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429376