<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 929 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429371</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order dated 30.04.2021 by the Adjudicating Authority due to serious material irregularity and patent illegality. The matter was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings. The dispute over the Respondent&#039;s filing of Counter/Reply/Response was resolved in favor of the Respondent, as it was confirmed that the required response had been submitted. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s failure to acknowledge the response led to a serious miscarriage of justice, prompting the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s intervention to rectify the error and ensure a fair determination based on natural justice and the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 07:49:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 929 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429371</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order dated 30.04.2021 by the Adjudicating Authority due to serious material irregularity and patent illegality. The matter was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings. The dispute over the Respondent&#039;s filing of Counter/Reply/Response was resolved in favor of the Respondent, as it was confirmed that the required response had been submitted. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s failure to acknowledge the response led to a serious miscarriage of justice, prompting the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s intervention to rectify the error and ensure a fair determination based on natural justice and the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>