<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 922 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429364</link>
    <description>The court found the Settlement Commission&#039;s order dismissing the Settlement Application flawed due to non-compliance with statutory timelines, failure to consider all relevant materials, and disregard for High Court directions. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and judicial directions. The writ appeal was disposed of with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 922 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429364</link>
      <description>The court found the Settlement Commission&#039;s order dismissing the Settlement Application flawed due to non-compliance with statutory timelines, failure to consider all relevant materials, and disregard for High Court directions. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and judicial directions. The writ appeal was disposed of with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>