<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 919 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the show cause notice demanding excise duty for supplies made during a specific period to be invalid. The appellant&#039;s issuance of a supplementary invoice in line with Section 142(2)(a) of the CGST Act was deemed compliant with tax obligations, leading to the dismissal of the demand for excise duty. The Tribunal set aside the order and granted the appellant consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 919 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the show cause notice demanding excise duty for supplies made during a specific period to be invalid. The appellant&#039;s issuance of a supplementary invoice in line with Section 142(2)(a) of the CGST Act was deemed compliant with tax obligations, leading to the dismissal of the demand for excise duty. The Tribunal set aside the order and granted the appellant consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>