<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304788</link>
    <description>Mala fides in land resumption requires proof by material evidence; unsupported allegations of political vendetta will not invalidate governmental action. Where the State&#039;s ownership is accepted and the grant or lease reserves a right of resumption for breach or public purpose, that contractual power can be enforced upon established violations such as unauthorised subletting. Natural justice is satisfied when a show-cause notice is issued, a reply is received, and a personal hearing is granted; refusal of access to policy-related records causes no prejudice in the circumstances. The resumption proceedings were upheld as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 14:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304788</link>
      <description>Mala fides in land resumption requires proof by material evidence; unsupported allegations of political vendetta will not invalidate governmental action. Where the State&#039;s ownership is accepted and the grant or lease reserves a right of resumption for breach or public purpose, that contractual power can be enforced upon established violations such as unauthorised subletting. Natural justice is satisfied when a show-cause notice is issued, a reply is received, and a personal hearing is granted; refusal of access to policy-related records causes no prejudice in the circumstances. The resumption proceedings were upheld as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>