<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 896 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deduction u/s 80IB based on the availability of the audit report during assessment, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It ruled that installation charges related to the sale of manufactured items are eligible for deduction, but service charges are not. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction and restrict disallowance of commission and consultancy expenses, directing the AO to recompute accordingly. The Tribunal also instructed the AO to quantify the deduction u/s 80IB by excluding expenses related to non-eligible receipts as per the Special Bench decision, providing specific directions for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 14:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 896 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deduction u/s 80IB based on the availability of the audit report during assessment, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It ruled that installation charges related to the sale of manufactured items are eligible for deduction, but service charges are not. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction and restrict disallowance of commission and consultancy expenses, directing the AO to recompute accordingly. The Tribunal also instructed the AO to quantify the deduction u/s 80IB by excluding expenses related to non-eligible receipts as per the Special Bench decision, providing specific directions for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>