<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 16 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30747</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Civil Appeals due to the lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice and unclear findings on the use of &#039;Reeta&#039; in Shikakai powder manufacturing. The Court highlighted the failure of the Department to examine manufacturing processes in excisability cases, emphasizing the necessity for precise allegations for a fair adjudication process. Despite legal precedents establishing the addition of &#039;Reeta&#039; as constituting manufacture, the Court found insufficient evidence to interfere in this case, maintaining a clear stance based on the specific circumstances presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 16 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30747</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Civil Appeals due to the lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice and unclear findings on the use of &#039;Reeta&#039; in Shikakai powder manufacturing. The Court highlighted the failure of the Department to examine manufacturing processes in excisability cases, emphasizing the necessity for precise allegations for a fair adjudication process. Despite legal precedents establishing the addition of &#039;Reeta&#039; as constituting manufacture, the Court found insufficient evidence to interfere in this case, maintaining a clear stance based on the specific circumstances presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>