https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429335 The court dismissed the petition challenging the impugned order dated 30th July 2019, which involved the interception and confiscation of prohibited goods. The petitioner's claims regarding the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, valuation and classification of goods, and alleged breach of natural justice were rejected. The court emphasized the availability of an appeal under Section 129E and directed the petitioner to approach the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), keeping all rights and contentions open for the appeal. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jun 2023 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429335 The court dismissed the petition challenging the impugned order dated 30th July 2019, which involved the interception and confiscation of prohibited goods. The petitioner's claims regarding the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, valuation and classification of goods, and alleged breach of natural justice were rejected. The court emphasized the availability of an appeal under Section 129E and directed the petitioner to approach the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), keeping all rights and contentions open for the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429335