<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 885 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429327</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the filing fell within the Supreme Court&#039;s COVID-19 limitation extension and the appellant had sought a certified copy within the protected period. On the merits, the tribunal held that a State tax authority&#039;s assessment order and lien/attachment created during CIRP could not be sustained on the reasoning adopted below, because a fiscal statute creating a first charge by operation of law may confer secured-creditor status and its effect must be assessed in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the liquidation framework. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 21:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 885 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429327</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the filing fell within the Supreme Court&#039;s COVID-19 limitation extension and the appellant had sought a certified copy within the protected period. On the merits, the tribunal held that a State tax authority&#039;s assessment order and lien/attachment created during CIRP could not be sustained on the reasoning adopted below, because a fiscal statute creating a first charge by operation of law may confer secured-creditor status and its effect must be assessed in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the liquidation framework. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>