<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1576 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304781</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appellant&#039;s contributions to the provident fund and state insurance fund were covered under section 43B of the Income Tax Act, allowing for the deduction. Additionally, the decision to remand the matter to the assessing officer for a fresh consideration based on the evidence presented was supported. The tax appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1576 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304781</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appellant&#039;s contributions to the provident fund and state insurance fund were covered under section 43B of the Income Tax Act, allowing for the deduction. Additionally, the decision to remand the matter to the assessing officer for a fresh consideration based on the evidence presented was supported. The tax appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>