<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 864 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TELANGANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429306</link>
    <description>AAR, Telangana rejected an application by a construction company seeking clarification on Hyderabad&#039;s geographical limits under GST Notification No.3 of 2019. The ruling was based on the application not meeting the specific categories outlined in Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017, thereby rendering the advance ruling request inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 864 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TELANGANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429306</link>
      <description>AAR, Telangana rejected an application by a construction company seeking clarification on Hyderabad&#039;s geographical limits under GST Notification No.3 of 2019. The ruling was based on the application not meeting the specific categories outlined in Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017, thereby rendering the advance ruling request inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>