<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 847 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions of Rs. 11,00,00,000/- for undisclosed net income and Rs. 44,80,634/- for interest expenses on unexplained cash credits were deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal agreed that the Rs. 11 crores had already been offered to tax, preventing double taxation, and the interest expenses were allowable based on previously confirmed genuine deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 847 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions of Rs. 11,00,00,000/- for undisclosed net income and Rs. 44,80,634/- for interest expenses on unexplained cash credits were deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal agreed that the Rs. 11 crores had already been offered to tax, preventing double taxation, and the interest expenses were allowable based on previously confirmed genuine deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>