<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 836 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on all issues. The judgment reaffirmed principles of selecting the least complex entity as the tested party, treatment of software expenses based on their nature and utility, acceptance of reliable segmental accounts for transfer pricing analysis, and rejection of unjustified transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 836 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on all issues. The judgment reaffirmed principles of selecting the least complex entity as the tested party, treatment of software expenses based on their nature and utility, acceptance of reliable segmental accounts for transfer pricing analysis, and rejection of unjustified transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>