<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 822 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429264</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the penalty under section 271FA for delay in filing Form SFT was dismissed. The Bench upheld the penalty imposed by the AO, finding no reasonable cause for the delay. The assessee&#039;s arguments of miscommunication, change in management, and lack of qualified staff were deemed insufficient justification. The order of the ld. CIT(A) was upheld, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 822 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429264</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the penalty under section 271FA for delay in filing Form SFT was dismissed. The Bench upheld the penalty imposed by the AO, finding no reasonable cause for the delay. The assessee&#039;s arguments of miscommunication, change in management, and lack of qualified staff were deemed insufficient justification. The order of the ld. CIT(A) was upheld, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>