<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 821 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax had properly initiated revision proceedings based on discrepancies in the assessment records. The Tribunal agreed with the decision to set aside the assessment order due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to conduct thorough inquiries into the creditworthiness of the donor and the genuineness of the gift transaction. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying such transactions and concluded that the original assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 821 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax had properly initiated revision proceedings based on discrepancies in the assessment records. The Tribunal agreed with the decision to set aside the assessment order due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to conduct thorough inquiries into the creditworthiness of the donor and the genuineness of the gift transaction. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying such transactions and concluded that the original assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>