<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 812 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429254</link>
    <description>A Section 9 insolvency application cannot be used where a genuine pre-existing dispute existed before the demand notice. Prior correspondence, legal notice, a criminal complaint, and objections to the supply claim and the appellant&#039;s authority to deal in the branded products showed that the dispute had already surfaced. Applying the settled principle under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Tribunal held that summary insolvency proceedings are not the forum for resolving contested claims. The application was therefore rightly rejected, and the dismissal of the insolvency petition was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 812 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429254</link>
      <description>A Section 9 insolvency application cannot be used where a genuine pre-existing dispute existed before the demand notice. Prior correspondence, legal notice, a criminal complaint, and objections to the supply claim and the appellant&#039;s authority to deal in the branded products showed that the dispute had already surfaced. Applying the settled principle under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Tribunal held that summary insolvency proceedings are not the forum for resolving contested claims. The application was therefore rightly rejected, and the dismissal of the insolvency petition was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>