https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429249 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the legality of the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the authorized officer can take possession of the attached property after serving a ten-day notice, even within the 45-day appeal period. The court emphasized adherence to the clear language of the law and upheld the statutory provisions without adding or subtracting from their plain meaning. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429249 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the legality of the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the authorized officer can take possession of the attached property after serving a ten-day notice, even within the 45-day appeal period. The court emphasized adherence to the clear language of the law and upheld the statutory provisions without adding or subtracting from their plain meaning. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429249