https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429245 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing both appeals and providing consequential relief. The rejection of the remission claim was found to be unjustified, as the fire incident was deemed a natural cause beyond the appellant's control. The timing of reversing cenvat credit was in compliance with statutory provisions, and the demand for duty on the lost goods was invalidated due to the unsustainable rejection of the remission claim. en-us Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:24:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429245 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing both appeals and providing consequential relief. The rejection of the remission claim was found to be unjustified, as the fire incident was deemed a natural cause beyond the appellant's control. The timing of reversing cenvat credit was in compliance with statutory provisions, and the demand for duty on the lost goods was invalidated due to the unsustainable rejection of the remission claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429245