<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1389 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304769</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that when goods are confiscated and the party does not opt to pay the fine, the sale proceeds vest with the Government, and penalty under Section 112 can still be imposed. The order for payment of sale proceeds without deduction of redemption fine was incorrect. The issue of whether the party can opt to pay the fine at this stage remains open for consideration by the Division Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1389 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304769</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that when goods are confiscated and the party does not opt to pay the fine, the sale proceeds vest with the Government, and penalty under Section 112 can still be imposed. The order for payment of sale proceeds without deduction of redemption fine was incorrect. The issue of whether the party can opt to pay the fine at this stage remains open for consideration by the Division Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>