<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 745 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the approval of the Resolution Plan, dismissing the appeal against rejection of objection and approval of the plan. The Appellant&#039;s request for an extension to furnish a Bank Guarantee was denied, leading to an adjournment for legal advice by the Committee of Creditors. The Tribunal excluded time from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to CoC considerations and directed completion within the specified timeframe. The Appellant&#039;s argument of the approved plan having less value was rejected, emphasizing adherence to CIRP timelines and CoC authority in approving plans.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 745 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the approval of the Resolution Plan, dismissing the appeal against rejection of objection and approval of the plan. The Appellant&#039;s request for an extension to furnish a Bank Guarantee was denied, leading to an adjournment for legal advice by the Committee of Creditors. The Tribunal excluded time from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to CoC considerations and directed completion within the specified timeframe. The Appellant&#039;s argument of the approved plan having less value was rejected, emphasizing adherence to CIRP timelines and CoC authority in approving plans.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>