<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 732 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Emphasizing judicial discipline, the Tribunal stressed consistency in decision-making based on previous rulings. It highlighted the importance of not allowing the Revenue to take a different stand on identical issues previously decided, ultimately supporting the respondent&#039;s position and maintaining the NIL rate of duty classification for the product in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 732 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Emphasizing judicial discipline, the Tribunal stressed consistency in decision-making based on previous rulings. It highlighted the importance of not allowing the Revenue to take a different stand on identical issues previously decided, ultimately supporting the respondent&#039;s position and maintaining the NIL rate of duty classification for the product in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>