<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304755</link>
    <description>The High Court applied the ratio of its earlier batch decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheta) Ltd. and held that the present appeal did not raise any substantial question of law. As the controversy was already governed by that precedent, no fresh legal issue required adjudication and the court declined to interfere. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304755</link>
      <description>The High Court applied the ratio of its earlier batch decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheta) Ltd. and held that the present appeal did not raise any substantial question of law. As the controversy was already governed by that precedent, no fresh legal issue required adjudication and the court declined to interfere. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>