<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2097 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304752</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the cost of planting and maintenance of immature rubber plants for the assessment year 2011-2012. The Tribunal ruled that the expenditure was not allowable as a deduction based on the nature of the expenses incurred. The decision was in line with the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Kerala High Court in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2097 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304752</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the cost of planting and maintenance of immature rubber plants for the assessment year 2011-2012. The Tribunal ruled that the expenditure was not allowable as a deduction based on the nature of the expenses incurred. The decision was in line with the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Kerala High Court in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>