<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1263 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304749</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, and the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act was modified to Rs.29,150 by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that a reasonable basis should be used for disallowance instead of applying Rule 8D for the assessment year 2007-08. The disallowance was determined at 25% of the dividend income received by the assessee, following the decision of the Bombay High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1263 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304749</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, and the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act was modified to Rs.29,150 by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that a reasonable basis should be used for disallowance instead of applying Rule 8D for the assessment year 2007-08. The disallowance was determined at 25% of the dividend income received by the assessee, following the decision of the Bombay High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>