<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 726 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it constituted a mere &quot;change of opinion&quot; without new tangible material, and there was no failure by the assessee to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the disallowance of the exemption under section 54F was also deemed invalid. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and quashing the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 726 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it constituted a mere &quot;change of opinion&quot; without new tangible material, and there was no failure by the assessee to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the disallowance of the exemption under section 54F was also deemed invalid. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and quashing the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>