<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 718 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision upholding the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) due to discrepancies between stamp duty values and sale consideration. The Tribunal directed reassessment by the AO, emphasizing the consideration of revised guideline values for fair market value determination. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the case for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 718 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision upholding the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) due to discrepancies between stamp duty values and sale consideration. The Tribunal directed reassessment by the AO, emphasizing the consideration of revised guideline values for fair market value determination. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the case for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>