https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429146 Concerted action to restrict the release, screening and exhibition of dubbed films in Karnataka was treated as anti-competitive conduct where the record showed coordinated opposition rather than isolated personal views. The Tribunal relied on the press meet, public statements, tweets, media reports and witness evidence to find a shared object to obstruct the informant's dubbed film, create a threatening atmosphere and suppress exhibition. It also noted that an earlier cease-and-desist order against similar restrictions had attained finality, reinforcing that such conduct could not lawfully continue. The Commission's finding of violation under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002 was affirmed. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429146 Concerted action to restrict the release, screening and exhibition of dubbed films in Karnataka was treated as anti-competitive conduct where the record showed coordinated opposition rather than isolated personal views. The Tribunal relied on the press meet, public statements, tweets, media reports and witness evidence to find a shared object to obstruct the informant's dubbed film, create a threatening atmosphere and suppress exhibition. It also noted that an earlier cease-and-desist order against similar restrictions had attained finality, reinforcing that such conduct could not lawfully continue. The Commission's finding of violation under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002 was affirmed. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429146