<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 703 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal challenging the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority. The Resolution Plan, approved by 99.97% of the Committee of Creditors, faced objections from the Appellant not part of the CoC. The Tribunal rejected the addition of 35 homebuyers/Financial Creditors in a class on record due to lack of voting on the Plan. The Appeal&#039;s arguments regarding project-wise voting, procedural violations, and rights of financial creditors&#039; representatives were addressed, affirming the binding nature of the majority decision. The Resolution Plan&#039;s clauses aimed at protecting homebuyers&#039; interests were deemed just, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 703 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal challenging the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority. The Resolution Plan, approved by 99.97% of the Committee of Creditors, faced objections from the Appellant not part of the CoC. The Tribunal rejected the addition of 35 homebuyers/Financial Creditors in a class on record due to lack of voting on the Plan. The Appeal&#039;s arguments regarding project-wise voting, procedural violations, and rights of financial creditors&#039; representatives were addressed, affirming the binding nature of the majority decision. The Resolution Plan&#039;s clauses aimed at protecting homebuyers&#039; interests were deemed just, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>