https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429137 The Tribunal determined that the adjudicating authority's demand for 5% or 6% of the total sale value was legally incorrect. It held that the appellant should only reverse the proportionate credit related to exempted activities, not the entire amount. The case was remanded for recalculating the reversal credit, allowing the appellant a fair hearing. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429137 The Tribunal determined that the adjudicating authority's demand for 5% or 6% of the total sale value was legally incorrect. It held that the appellant should only reverse the proportionate credit related to exempted activities, not the entire amount. The case was remanded for recalculating the reversal credit, allowing the appellant a fair hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429137