https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304735 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It found the denial of cenvat credit based on incorrect calculations, specifically noting that services exclusively used for dutiable services should not have been considered for credit reversal. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted that the time-barred demand lacked allegations of suppression or intention to evade duty, directing a detailed reexamination of this issue. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present their case and submit further evidence during the fresh adjudication process. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:28:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304735 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It found the denial of cenvat credit based on incorrect calculations, specifically noting that services exclusively used for dutiable services should not have been considered for credit reversal. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted that the time-barred demand lacked allegations of suppression or intention to evade duty, directing a detailed reexamination of this issue. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present their case and submit further evidence during the fresh adjudication process. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304735