<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1608 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304741</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the amendment of the substantial question of law figure and dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The court ruled that the revenue share of license fees was a deductible expenditure and disallowed the interest expenditure on an interest-free loan to a subsidiary. Citing previous judgments against the Revenue on similar issues, the court found no new substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1608 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304741</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the amendment of the substantial question of law figure and dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The court ruled that the revenue share of license fees was a deductible expenditure and disallowed the interest expenditure on an interest-free loan to a subsidiary. Citing previous judgments against the Revenue on similar issues, the court found no new substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>