<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eligibility as ITC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118194</link>
    <description>Whether a supplier may claim Input Tax Credit of IGST paid on a penalty imposed by a contracting authority is contested: the transaction has been identified as a service under Schedule II but &#039;penalty&#039; is not expressly mentioned, creating potential dispute. If tax is assessed and paid by the recipient authority, the supplier may be able to claim credit of the tax so paid; alternatively the supplier could seek repayment from the authority in light of GST circular clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:43:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eligibility as ITC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118194</link>
      <description>Whether a supplier may claim Input Tax Credit of IGST paid on a penalty imposed by a contracting authority is contested: the transaction has been identified as a service under Schedule II but &#039;penalty&#039; is not expressly mentioned, creating potential dispute. If tax is assessed and paid by the recipient authority, the supplier may be able to claim credit of the tax so paid; alternatively the supplier could seek repayment from the authority in light of GST circular clarification.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:43:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>