<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 688 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429130</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the addition of capital gains in an income tax assessment case for the assessment year 2010-11. The appellant&#039;s challenge against the assessing officer&#039;s decision was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing the execution of the registered sale deed as constituting a transfer under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by legal precedents, and the High Court found no substantial question of law, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Additionally, concerns regarding the violation of natural justice principles and the consideration of additional evidence were not deemed substantial, leading to the rejection of the appeal on those grounds as well. The Tribunal&#039;s delay in delivering the judgment due to exceptional circumstances like a lockdown was justified and accepted by the High Court, further supporting the dismissal of the appeal and related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 688 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429130</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the addition of capital gains in an income tax assessment case for the assessment year 2010-11. The appellant&#039;s challenge against the assessing officer&#039;s decision was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing the execution of the registered sale deed as constituting a transfer under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by legal precedents, and the High Court found no substantial question of law, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Additionally, concerns regarding the violation of natural justice principles and the consideration of additional evidence were not deemed substantial, leading to the rejection of the appeal on those grounds as well. The Tribunal&#039;s delay in delivering the judgment due to exceptional circumstances like a lockdown was justified and accepted by the High Court, further supporting the dismissal of the appeal and related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>