<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 681 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429123</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for proper verification and examination of expenses and claims in compliance with the relevant tax provisions. The appeal for condonation of delay in filing by the Revenue was accepted, leading to admission for adjudication. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the business development expenses claimed by the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s ground regarding the disallowance of gift expenditure under Sec.40(a)(ia) as the issue was already set aside for verification by the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 681 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429123</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for proper verification and examination of expenses and claims in compliance with the relevant tax provisions. The appeal for condonation of delay in filing by the Revenue was accepted, leading to admission for adjudication. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the business development expenses claimed by the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s ground regarding the disallowance of gift expenditure under Sec.40(a)(ia) as the issue was already set aside for verification by the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>