<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 680 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429122</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving irrevocable cessation of liability for section 41(1) and the necessity of explaining the source of funds for cash credits under section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:51:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 680 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429122</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving irrevocable cessation of liability for section 41(1) and the necessity of explaining the source of funds for cash credits under section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>