<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 648 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Revision Order under section 263 of the Income-Tax Act, directing the reassessment to consider Long Term Capital Gain instead of Short Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal found the original assessment valid, emphasizing the AO&#039;s diligence and proper verification. The appeal outcome favored the assessee, highlighting the importance of thorough examination in assessment proceedings to ensure accurate tax implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:51:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 648 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Revision Order under section 263 of the Income-Tax Act, directing the reassessment to consider Long Term Capital Gain instead of Short Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal found the original assessment valid, emphasizing the AO&#039;s diligence and proper verification. The appeal outcome favored the assessee, highlighting the importance of thorough examination in assessment proceedings to ensure accurate tax implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>