<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 644 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty under section 114A but confirming the penalty under section 112(a) &amp;amp; (b)(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to produce necessary documentation related to the valuation of the imported consignment, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling obligations as a Customs Broker.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:51:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 644 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty under section 114A but confirming the penalty under section 112(a) &amp;amp; (b)(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to produce necessary documentation related to the valuation of the imported consignment, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling obligations as a Customs Broker.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>