<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 635 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429077</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, advising the petitioner to seek relief from the appropriate court. The court did not address the legality of the cognizance taken by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai, as it had already determined the jurisdictional issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 635 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429077</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, advising the petitioner to seek relief from the appropriate court. The court did not address the legality of the cognizance taken by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai, as it had already determined the jurisdictional issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>