<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 633 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429075</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the proceedings and de-freeze a bank account under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. It held that the petitioners had not exhausted their remedies under the Act and had not objected to the notice, deeming the petition premature. The Court advised the petitioners to pursue further action if they had any remaining cause of action, concluding that it was premature to grant the requested relief at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 633 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429075</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the proceedings and de-freeze a bank account under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. It held that the petitioners had not exhausted their remedies under the Act and had not objected to the notice, deeming the petition premature. The Court advised the petitioners to pursue further action if they had any remaining cause of action, concluding that it was premature to grant the requested relief at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>