<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 59 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304724</link>
    <description>Land acquisition for industrial development may constitute a public purpose, but the declaration fails where compensation is not genuinely funded from public revenues and the authority proceeds on an erroneous factual basis. Acquisition undertaken in substance for a company requires compliance with the mandatory Part VII procedure; use of the public-purpose route cannot avoid those requirements. Delegation of acquisition powers to a Commissioner remains valid where it implements prescribed legislative policy rather than transfers an essential legislative function, and a State law with Presidential assent prevails over inconsistent earlier Central law. Urgency powers cannot exclude Section 5-A unless the land satisfies the statutory condition of being waste or arable land and the authority forms a genuine, applied opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 59 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304724</link>
      <description>Land acquisition for industrial development may constitute a public purpose, but the declaration fails where compensation is not genuinely funded from public revenues and the authority proceeds on an erroneous factual basis. Acquisition undertaken in substance for a company requires compliance with the mandatory Part VII procedure; use of the public-purpose route cannot avoid those requirements. Delegation of acquisition powers to a Commissioner remains valid where it implements prescribed legislative policy rather than transfers an essential legislative function, and a State law with Presidential assent prevails over inconsistent earlier Central law. Urgency powers cannot exclude Section 5-A unless the land satisfies the statutory condition of being waste or arable land and the authority forms a genuine, applied opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>