<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1108 - CESTAT  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, holding that the disputed services, both before and after the amendment, should be considered as &quot;input services&quot; eligible for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the Department&#039;s objections were not valid, and the orders denying Cenvat credit were unjustified. Consequential relief was granted to the appellants in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:10:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1108 - CESTAT  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, holding that the disputed services, both before and after the amendment, should be considered as &quot;input services&quot; eligible for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the Department&#039;s objections were not valid, and the orders denying Cenvat credit were unjustified. Consequential relief was granted to the appellants in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>